Thursday, November 20, 2014

Mathematical Theory of Everything

Three of everything

10/Φπ(10/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.00000000000000

The principal holism of these abstract values in my equation may be simply expressed

Φπ(1/π)  returns to PHI

Φπ(Φ-1) returns to Pi

Φ(Φ-1) = 1.0000000000

Φπ(1/π)(³√Φ^-3) = the holistic unit

Two numerators are needed beyond 1

10/(3+1/3) = 3

10/3 = 3.3333333333...

10Φπ(1/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.333333333...


Φπ(10/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.333333333...

10/3.33333 = 3.00000300000...

10/10Φπ(1/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.0000000000

Notice how the numerators cannot "cancel out" when it is expressed this way.

If 3.33333...runs infinitely, as in 10/3 = 3.33333, then 10/3.3333333 produces an infinitely regressive hanging 3, which cannot be seen unless one stops repeating threes in the formula. Past the decimal is regressive, into infinity, thus possessing an infinite quantum value. 3.00000.....000003, which is the ultimate quantum value of the unit. It needs so much attribution, that adding zero, gives the answer of simply 3.

Returning the circle to its holistic value

The 1 in this simple equation is the absolute holistic value of PHI

3 is the absolute holistic value of Pi.

10 is the absolute holistic value of the decimal number system.

Here is my final theory:

 I own a high powered scientific calculator specially designed for calculating long decimals . This is the end of ten years of obsessed research. You do the math.

10/(3π) • 3 = 3.18309886184
Which is pi when there is a radian of 20

10/π = 3.18309886184 also

3.18309886184 multiplied by Pi itself equals 10

Physicists are getting this value using much more complex equations

(3/10)π = 0.942477796077

This is the missing attribution of Pi when the radian is 20.

3.18309886184 • 0.942477796077 = 3


10/3π•3(3/10)π = 3


3π(10/3π)(3/10) = 3


π(10/π)(3/10) = 3

There is no "canceling out" as I have demonstrated the actual decimal product.

Pi itself will always exist but the ratio of the circumference to the
diameter of a circle as a whole unit is 3/1

Further simplistic calculations.

3/π = 0.9549296585512

This is the missing Attribution of Pi with a diameter of one.

Pi is found by unfurling a circle along a number line, attaining the value of 3.14159...
But a circle is a holistic figure, and one cannot straighten an infinite curve. when one does so,
the holistic value of 3 loses an attribution equivalent to 0.95492965512..
Multiply this decimal by Pi, and the answer is simply 3.


3/π • π = 3


3/π^3 • π^3 = 3

See how the circle "submits" to the equilateral triangle?


Φ [PHI] = 1.61803398875....

Reconciling Pi with the Golden Ratio

(Φπ)(³√Φ^-3) = Pi

(Φπ)(³√π^-3) = PHI

Furthermore I've discovered a PHI approximation, utilizing PI

10/π²(³√Φ^-3) = 1.63941118914

Also here is an approximation of Pi, using only Phi

3+2Φ(Φ^-3)/10 = 3.15723027555...

Four golden spirals make a circle.
Color coded so you can see individual spirals.
Circle is at absolute limit of size and position

Curve of golden spiral approached Pi

Squaring the area of a circle using only euclidean vectors; note symmetry with divine proportion.

Vectors approach golden ratio.

Calculating further:

1/Φ(π/10)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.18309886184

Once again I'm getting this value. This time using PHI

1/Φ(π/10)(³√Φ^-3)•π(3/10) = 3.000000000


1/Φ^-3 is what the Ancient Greeks used to try and figure a universal formula.

One of my colleagues said that I can't use PHI-1 because it loses attribution:

Though 10/Φπ(Φ-1)(10/3π) = 3.000000000

10/Φπ(³√Φ-^3)(10/3π) = some weird decimal.

It needs so much attribution that it MUST BE

10/Φπ(10/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.000000000 (the zeros infinitely truncate)

Yes, I'm using the value of PHIpi.

add zero, and it's simply 3

10/Φπ(10/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3.000000000...Answer + 0 = 3 (adding zero returns attribution removing truncation)

10/Φπ(10/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = 3

The principal holism of these abstract values in my equation may be simply expressed

10/(3+1/3) = 3

That's 10/3.33333333333.... = 3

The 1 in this simple equation is the absolute holistic value of PHI.

3 Is the absolute holistic value of Pi.

10 is the absolute holistic value of the decimal number system.

Red is the absolute holistic value of the color spectrum

Perfect Phi ratio analogous to the holistic Pi value of 3

Absolute holistic expression



I calculated that any whole number (q = quantity) taken as the numerators,
provides the answer of 3, unto INFINITY

Though only 10 may be used in the holistic equation,
any whole number may be used in the extreme equation.

This is a unique 3, so I'm going to use a special symbol.

  q/Φπ(q/3π)(³√Φ^-3) = ॐ

Three of Everything

It's more easily expressed in Sanskrit.

I discovered that though in the holistic equation the numerator must be 3 itself, in the (universal) equation, the integer of 3 of 3π may be replaced with any other whole number, unto infinity,
And as long as the numerators are the same, the answer is that number.


12/Φπ(12/7π)(³√Φ^-3) = 7.000000000

Would there be an infinitely regressive quantum decimal seven?

q/Φπ(q/Nπ)(³√Φ^-3) = N

Equal to any whole number, unto infinity.

This is the formula which provides access to all whole number representations of reality.

The Otherness of Everything.

(Ultimate expression)

Further interesting calculations:

1/Φπ(10/3)(Φ^-3) = 0.250003830295


Figures for approaching the thickness of the line in a square

The helical Universe

Into the fourth dimension
scalar mass ∆


Noesis of the quality:

Infinite Expression of the Monadic Pneuma

For gnosis of what man has shielded from himself, let the antinomies of time and space which draw the mind into objectivity collapse. The nomen qua sit materially assumed as truism via empirical rendering of referential differentiation of subjective selfhood and objective externality is a delusive rendering of relational position, and is not a static or eternally present quality even in the cognition of the subjective perceiver of such qualities. It is merely given linguistic attributive condition, and in no way represents any quality inherent in relational phenomena.

   The present condition of the collective acumen of self determination is an epistemological anarchism, a self indictitive memetic abyss and a fallacious equation of consciousness with matter.

   Here, one will explore the actuation of Selfhood as an infinitely regressive monadic constant, removed of empirical accruation of material association. Indwelling the mind is no quality sans that which is produced, therefore reflection into the substrate of intangibility is impossible sans removal of attachment to these representations. The intrinsic nature of the noumenal mind is an absolute ontological monad, accumulating nothing, producing nothing. Yet then how is cognition attained? It is the fallacy of position which gives rise to the quality of cognition; the erroneous fiction held as truism that the self exists in space, and is therefore relative to positional references. To draw away from empirical designations of relational space, the mind must understand itself to be counter-spacial. The noumenal substrate cannot be attained until it is understood in terms of counter-space, for the empirical consciousness cannot do anything but project itself outward into a spacial representation that cannot contain the self. A void is not a container of itself, but is the progenerator of positional being, and anything which exists in such void cannot itself be the noumenal substrate. Therefore the mind is nonpositional, and exists independent of both matter and space.

   Gnosis of an ontological noumenon may only be held when it is understood to be produced by no qualitative construct. It is not dependent on time, nor on space, nor on matter; therefore it cannot be understood through cognitive meanderings pertaining to its qualities: it possesses none. It is neither induced nor maintained, and therefore theories of both externalism and internalism do not bring one closer to gnosis. It is simply not a spacial representation. A way to begin to understand it, is to conceptually annihilate the view of "universe" as a place in which the self dwells, instead gaining the understanding that any perceivable modality of locus indwells the perceiver. So then the noumenon should be understood to be an absolute monad, possessing nothing extraneous nor internal to itself. A conceivable metaphor would be to fill all of space with an infinite solid mass, a singularity unto itself. Such a mass would possess no size or shape, as all points within it are equivalent and therefore determining the distance of one point to another is impossible: though it is infinitely expansive, it is also a unitary singularity. Imagining the noumenal mind to exist as this mass, it is understandable why it is impossible to conceive of it via spacial relation: there is none. The Self [Pneuma] is infinite in this way, and cannot be understood through the modality of perception. But as the mind tends to think of itself as a carrier of indwelling or extraneous properties, there is the fallacy of representative identity, a mass which is finite (body) housing an inherently limited mind. There is no such body, nor is there such limitation; it is merely a representative quality of that which can possess no actual quality. It has no foundation because it IS its own foundation. The mind is therefore synonymous with the Self, lacking nothing via the actuation of inflexed self-directed gnosis. The mind is a force unto itself, not related to the material substrate. Thus to be understood: as a thought is intangent then the thinker is intangent. Let the dwelling space of mind exist as the rational core.